Faaez Samadi
Apr 4, 2019

Australia passes social media law with severe penalties for violent content

Bill proposed by prime minister on Saturday introduces fine and jail time as punishment for breaches.

Australian Prime Minister Office Scott Morrison and wife his Jenny visiting the Al Noor Mosque in Christchurch to pay their respects after the attacks. 

(Photo: Adam Taylor/Australian Prime Minister's Office/AFP)
Australian Prime Minister Office Scott Morrison and wife his Jenny visiting the Al Noor Mosque in Christchurch to pay their respects after the attacks. (Photo: Adam Taylor/Australian Prime Minister's Office/AFP)

Australia’s parliament today passed new legislation introducing much tougher fines for social-media platforms that do not deal with violent content on their platforms.

According to the new law, social-media companies are liable for fines of up 10% of their annual turnover if violent content is not taken down within an “expeditious” timeframe. The content in question is defined as “the playing or streaming of terrorism, murder, attempted murder, torture, rape and kidnapping on social media”.

Furthermore, individuals at these companies could face up to three-year prison sentences and/or fines for infringing The Sharing of Abhorrent Violent Material bill. It was proposed by prime minister Scott Morrison on Saturday, in the wake of the Christchurch attacks and the role social media played in spreading the perpetrator’s livestream of the mass murder.


READ MORE


“Big social-media companies have a responsibility to take every possible action to ensure their technology products are not exploited by murderous terrorists,” Morrison said in a statement. “This is about keeping Australians safe by forcing social-media companies to step up and do what the community expects of them to stop terrorists and criminals spreading their hate.”

During debate on the bill in parliament on Thursday, attorney general Christian Porter said the legislation was “likely a world first”. In the days following its proposal, it has sparked a fierce debate over free speech and the accountability of social-media companies. There is also significant legal debate over what constitutes “reasonable time” in taking down content when the penalties are so severe.

A spokesperson for Google said in a statement: "We have zero tolerance for terrorist content on our platforms. Over the last few years we have invested heavily in human review teams and smart technology that helps us quickly detect, review, and remove this type of content. We are committed to leading the way in developing new technologies and standards for identifying and removing terrorist content. We are working with government agencies, law enforcement and across industry, including as a founding member of the Global Internet Forum To Counter Terrorism, to keep this type of content off our platforms. We will continue to engage on this crucial issue.”

Industry group DIGI, which represents Google, Facebook, Twitter and others in Australia, said in a statement that the law “was conceived and passed in five days” and without “meaningful consultation”.

“[The law] does nothing to address hate speech, which was the fundamental motivation for the tragic Christchurch terrorist attacks,” said Sunita Bose, DIGI managing director.  

“With the vast volumes of content uploaded to the internet every second, this is a highly complex problem that requires discussion with the technology industry, legal experts, the media and civil society to get the solution right—that didn’t happen this week.”

Bose added that Australia’s new law was out of step with notice-and-takedown regimes in Europe and the US. “[The law] threatens employees within any company that has user-generated content to be potentially jailed for the misuse of their services—even if they are unaware of it. This is not how legislation should be made in a democracy like Australia.”

Related Articles

Just Published

6 minutes ago

Uber Eats makes it weird with 'choose your own' ...

Things turn strange for Ash Barty, Nick Kyrgios and Todd Woodbridge in the latest Special Group campaign for the delivery service.

7 minutes ago

Is Topics too basic?

Google Chrome's new proposed cookie alternative may be favoured by consumers and regulators, but appears to offer significantly reduced value for advertisers, according to early reactions from adtech experts.

8 minutes ago

Women to Watch Greater China 2022

Presenting our second annual list of 30 inspiring and innovative female talents making their mark in marketing and communications across Greater China.

15 minutes ago

Women to Watch Greater China 2022: Ida Li, Saatchi ...

A versatile planner with persistence, loyalty and drive, Li has been instrumental in helping PG One nurture long-term business partnerships with well-established brands.