Chris Reed
Apr 3, 2013

Will Scoot lead the way and abandon Facebook?

Singapore Airline owned low cost carrier Scoot are threatening to give up their social media presence just to "see what happens". Revealed to Customer Loyalty 2013 conference goers recently by Commercial Director Steven Greenway.

Will Scoot lead the way and abandon Facebook?


In what was one of the most honest performances from a senior marketing professional that I have ever seen at a conference Greenway admitted that "sales were all that mattered, there was no time for a long term strategy, don't employ any consultants/agencies- do it yourself, and they enjoyed trying things to see if they worked". 

The last comment was particularly related to some very cool and innovative social media tactics that have driven tens of thousands of new fans to Fly Scoot. These include a "beat the fare down" promotion which resulted in thousands of people liking the new Scoot fare to Seoul from Singapore. In doing so they lowered the price from $300 to $188 and Scoot sold thousands of tickets on the back of it. They even promoted it through a cheesy yet funny Korean soap opera type drama that they filmed in an afternoon at Scoot offices. 

Both tactics were promoted through facebook which makes the statement that Scoot would "give up social just to see what happens". Brave and slightly bizarre. In essence what Greenway was saying is that facebook "likes" themself do not generate any tickets sales or revenue. People are there on facebook mostly to complain about everything from the food to the service according to Greenway.


Bravely and rightly in my view Greenway believes that leaving up all kinds of comments, good and bad, on the Scoot facebook site is the right thing to do.

Scoot have 253,000 likes on facebook, whereas Coca Cola are the number one brand on facebook with 62 million likes. They admitted recently that this actually drove no direct sales

Eric Schmidt, Coca-Cola's senior manager of marketing strategy and insights said "We didn't see any statistically significant relationship between our buzz (on facebook) and our short-term sales."

So on that basis is Greenway right to drop his social media?

Another reason to abandon facebook maybe the hassle factor. Having just looked at their facebook site Scoot have had to remove some comments due to them crossing the line of offensive abuse (see enclosed), the one area that Greenway admitted that they remove comments on the facebook site.

So is facebook worth the hassle? Does it actually drive sales or is it like an app that a brand thinks it needs but then doesn't spend any money marketing, just a nice to have?

Coke don't think so, Greenway seems unconvinced. If brands like these (bearing in mind that Scoot is a purely on line brand), don't feel that facebook works from a commercial business point of view, what hope do other brands have in justifying social media presence and resources?


Related Articles

Just Published

13 hours ago

How to prepare for hybrid commerce: Chinese ...

As consumers seamlessly hop between physical and online, brands are expected to provide real-time stock information and personalised experiences across all of their touchpoints. But they must demonstrate a value exchange to consumers to collect the data they need.

14 hours ago

Data shows brands don’t need social media accounts ...

Data from a Jing Daily report shows that luxury brands no longer rely on their own social media accounts in China with more engagement relying on KOLs.

14 hours ago

Apple debuts 2022 Chinese New Year film (clear some ...

The company's offering for this year is a 23-minute epic—shot on iPhones—about the making of an epic film within the film, also shot on iPhones.

14 hours ago

How women’s health brands communicate on social ...

Female founders of women’s health brands say censorship makes it challenging to properly address women’s concerns.