Chris Reed
Mar 30, 2013

Burger King’s new BOMB campaign blows up in its mouth

Burger King has always had a terrible reputation for creative. Their new advert damages the brand yet further and stretches the limits of taste to the limit.

Burger King’s new BOMB campaign blows up in its mouth

In the context of North Korea and South Korea/The United States of America’s nuclear sabre rattling Burger King have decided to create this advert. 

Yes that is a nuclear bomb going off. Why? Burger King have decided to create a campaign called BOMB and match the “creative idea” with an illustration of a nuclear bomb, not just any bomb, a nuclear bomb going off.

Why BOMB? Well if you follow the “creative” (and I really do use this word loosely) through they actually get BOMB from Bacon for B, Onion for O, Chips for….(no they couldn’t fit C into BOMB so they didn’t use the letter C …..), Mayo for M, BBQ Sauce for B not  BS for BOMBS or something else being with BS which is what this advert is.

And people wonder why creatives’ often get a bad reputation when you see work like this you do wonder what was going through the creative and marketing people’s head. What was the brief? What was the brainstorm that came up with this like?

I am not sure where this was created, I assume it’s a global campaign and therefore created in the US. Maybe they are oblivious to what is going on in the world.

Maybe because Korea v’s Korea is foreign news and US channels are notorious for only showing domestic news that the creative who designed this didn’t know what was going on….maybe they are just stupid and lack any imagination….

However as the cartoon, right, was in the New York Times I have to conclude it was pure ignorance and inability to empathise with the customer demographic or just laziness of the heighest order. 

As I live in Singapore and this advert was full page in the free newspaper Today and Korea v’s Korea has been a hot topic of conversation, and was front page news on the same day this advert went in and it has been constantly on TV news I am amazed that the Singapore/Asia office ran this advert.

It’s insensitive, tasteless and does nothing for the brand whatsoever apart from to emphaises how far behind their competitors they are in the creative as well as product sense.

Related Articles

Just Published

1 day ago

Uproar: Are animal portrayals in ads a new brand risk?

Advertisers and agencies love animals, because animals sell. But a Year of the Tiger Gucci campaign that made activists growl shows that the definition of what’s appropriate may be evolving when it comes to using the world's fauna.

1 day ago

Mark Heap on ‘moving across the aisles’ to ...

Media agencies offer broadly the same services as one another, and use propositions like ‘good growth’ and ‘people first’ to establish an identity. But what do these mean, in practical terms, and how do they influence leadership strategies? Mark Heap takes us inside the industry.

1 day ago

The ride of the tiger: Feast your eyes on BMW's ...

While other brands make long, dramatic Chinese New Year films, the carmaker and TBWA's Bolt have programmed in a very different route: 90 seconds that's 'nothing but sheer joy'.

1 day ago

The Beijing Olympics: A non-starter for global sponsors

SHANGHAI ZHAN PODCAST: Beijing-based sports-marketing expert Mark Dreyer says the games will see largely Chinese brands targeting the China market, with many employing Chinese-American skier/model Eileen Gu.