Kim Benjamin
Aug 5, 2014

Procter & Gamble wields axe on up to 100 of its least profitable brands

Procter & Gamble announced today that up to 100 of its least profitable brands will be axed as it looks to streamline its costs and focus on its core brands

AG Lafley
AG Lafley

The FMCG giant, whose brands include Pampers, Ariel and Gillette, said that it will shed about 90 to 100 brands around the globe over the next year or two, leaving it with about 70 to 80 brands. It did not name which products it intends to keep but they will be organised into up to a dozen business units under "four focused industry areas".

According to P&G, its 70 to 80 leading brands accounted for 90 per cent of its sales and 90 per cent of its profit in the year to 30 June. 

On a call with analysts, CEO AG Lafley said the strategy would create a new streamlined P&G "that will continue to grow faster and more sustainably, reliably create more value".

In June, P&G announced that it was axing the marketing director role across its entire portfolio of brands, and replacing this with brand directors. 

This article was first published on marketingmagazine.co.uk

Source:
Brand Republic

Related Articles

Just Published

11 hours ago

Algorithms built for efficiency can be a disaster ...

We need to work with the algorithms, not for them.

11 hours ago

Amazon, Microsoft, Spotify fastest growers in ...

Facebook's brand value declines for third straight year – but Instagram is a newcomer in the top 20.

21 hours ago

Trigger warning: This Hyundai ad is scary on purpose

AnalogFolk's campaign for the Australia launch of the i30 N-Line sedan sets a definite tone. If you can't bear to watch, the agency suggests, then this is not the car for you.