Ad Nut
Jun 15, 2021

Pet 'parents' promote 'pet-ernity' leave policies

A PR-driven campaign out of Australia, by Eleven Sydney on behalf of retailer PetCulture, argues that pet "parents" need leave to care for their "fur babies". Please, let's not do this.

Pet 'parents' promote 'pet-ernity' leave policies

'Pets are people too', declares a campaign by Eleven Sydney for Aussie petcare retailer PetCulture.

No, they're not, counters Ad Nut. But more on that later.

The basic thrust of the campaign is that employers should allow their people the flexibility to care for their pets. Ad Nut wholeheartedly agrees. Although far too independent to ever choose "pet" status, Ad Nut recognises that the arrangement works very well for lots of humans and their non-human animal companions. Both sides can benefit greatly from these relationships. 

And this well-made and fine campaign explains the need for what it calls 'pet-ernity' leave in this video:


The brand has also released a more general brand video, which Ad Nut found hilarious:

Nice work, and Ad Nut's good friend Surekha Ragavan has already covered this campaign in PRWeek, using far more journalistic professionalism than Ad Nut can muster. So if you want more details, please go read her article.

Now for Ad Nut's somewhat tangential rant about the whole 'pet parent' and 'fur baby' thing.

If you're going to commit to caring for a pet, you must take the time to understand that sentient being on its own terms. All creatures great and small have their own particular requirements, physically and mentally, and it's irresponsible and harmful for humans to treat their pets like small humans.

To take just one example, on the one paw, Ad Nut doesn't mind seeing obese murderous beasts, because they are far too slow to be a menace to squirrelkind. But on the other paw, dogs fed too much human food—or simply too much food—are doomed to experience health problems and even premature death. And this is due to nothing but the inability of their humans to feed them in accordance with their actual needs.

Of course, many humans treat their pets appropriately even though they indulge in the "parent/baby" nomenclature. But Ad Nut submits that the terminology may do more harm than good. Perhaps custodian or guardian or protector or champion would better reflect the kind of devotion that a pet deserves, while still acknowledging that pets are not humans and shouldn't be treated as such. Just a thought from one non-human animal who is capable of speaking out.   

Ad Nut is a surprisingly literate woodland creature that for unknown reasons has an unhealthy obsession with advertising. Ad Nut gathers ads from all over Asia and the world for your viewing pleasure, because Ad Nut loves you. You can also check out Ad Nut's Advertising Hall of Fame, or read about Ad Nut's strange obsession with 'murderous beasts'.

 

Related Articles

Just Published

9 hours ago

Skoda India parks creative mandate at Wunderman ...

The mandate was bagged following a multi-agency pitch, and the account will be led out of Wunderman Thompson’s Mumbai office.

9 hours ago

Why TikTok is not the place to be for brands during ...

Before and after the game are a different story as brands “scratch the surface” of what they can do on the platform for big events.

10 hours ago

Accenture brings on Magic Leap chief design officer ...

James Temple to head up Accenture Song’s metaverse capabilities, succeeding Mark Curtis, who is moving to its global sustainability studio.

10 hours ago

Arthur Sadoun interview: Publicis’ ‘profound ...

CEO talks to Campaign UK at Q4 results about rewarding talent and paying an average salary increase of 8% last year.