Emily Tan
Nov 21, 2017

YouTube killing channels said to 'exploit' children

The platform has terminated a number of channels for violating its terms of service.

Greg Chism
Greg Chism

YouTube in recent days has terminated a number of channels, and deleted specific videos from others. One deleted channel, Toy Freaks, has been accused of exploiting children who appeared in its videos.

Another prominent terminated channel, Webs and Tiaras, had racked up billions of views on countless videos featuring Spiderman and Elsa from Frozen.

The moves come after the mainstream press began reporting on the existence of such channels, which boast view numbers in the billions despite posting bizarre, mostly nonsensical content designed to attract children.

The Times reported that Toy Freaks, which has attracted 7 billion views since its launch in 2011, had videos exploiting children, including one with two girls, one nine years of age, wearing baby clothes, sucking pacifiers and being terrified by live snakes. The channel was run by a single father from Illinois, Greg Chism, and the children featured are his two daughters. 

YouTube said, in a statement issued to Campaign, that the channel had been terminated for violation of its policies. 

"We take child safety extremely seriously and have clear policies against child endangerment," the statement said. "We recently tightened the enforcement of these policies to tackle content featuring minors where we receive signals that cause concern. It’s not always clear that the uploader of the content intends to break our rules, but we may still remove their videos to help protect viewers, uploaders and children. We will be conducting a broader review of associated content in conjunction with expert Trusted Flaggers." 

Advertisers, including Iceland, O2 and Which?, have suspended advertising after the report demonstrated to them that their brands were appearing on clips in which "youngsters were distressed and in 'inappropriate' and 'disturbing' scenarios". 

Other advertisers named were Yamaha Music and Dropbox.

This is not the first time The Times has run an exposé that calls YouTube's brand safety into question. In February, the title broke the news that the platform was running advertising against extremist content. Advertisers pulled out and some have still not returned to the platform. 

The issue cropped up again in June when it was learnt that UK political party ads were running against extremist content. 

Source:
Campaign UK

Related Articles

Just Published

6 hours ago

Breaking down the post-cookie solutions: Unified ID 2.0

There are dozens of post-cookie solutions. But how do they work and how do they compare to one another across key metrics such as scale, user intrusiveness and tech? This series will attempt to demystify the biggest solutions, starting with Unified ID 2.0.

7 hours ago

PHD adds Audi to SAIC Volkswagen portfolio in China

Pitch-free win of planning and buying follows the agency taking over media duties for the company's Volkswagen and Skoda output in December.

7 hours ago

Four rooms: A quartet of funny short films about ...

For interior-design company Livspace, Singapore boutique agency Societal spoofs four popular film genres.

7 hours ago

China's new tech and stay-at-home brands gain power ...

Embattled Huawei's crown slips as Alibaba Group and Bytedance surge to the top in Kantar's latest Chinese Global Brand Builders report.