David Blecken
Oct 12, 2017

ADK 'resisted opportunities', preferring 'disastrous' investments: WPP

Accusations fly as the ADK-WPP saga turns ugly.

WPP CEO Sir Martin Sorrell (AFP)
WPP CEO Sir Martin Sorrell (AFP)

Resistance to Bain Capital’s bid to buy ADK is intensifying, with WPP accusing the Japanese company of having “improperly attempted to terminate its cooperation and business alliance”.

In a new statement, WPP notes that ADK’s sale of its 2.4 percent stake in WPP, which is worth around US$576 million, goes against shareholder advice and would trigger “damaging” tax charges and cancel promised dividends.

WPP’s aggressive statement follows one from ADK on Tuesday that aimed to clarify its position on the matter and reiterated its support for Bain’s $1.35 billion offer. ADK also refuted the idea that termination of its partnership is invalid, claiming “either party may terminate [it] at any time by giving not less than 12 months’ written notice”.

In its statement, WPP reinforced its own position: that the tender offer “significantly undervalues ADK”. Silchester International Investors, ADK’s second-largest shareholder, has also publicly expressed that view.

See all our coverage of the ADK-WPP fight over Bain's bid

WPP also takes issue with ADK’s apparent failure to seriously explore alternatives to Bain’s offer. It suggests the board acted purely out of self-interest and ignored options that could benefit stakeholders. ADK claims to have “sounded out” other potential buyers, but admitted that Bain was the only one to make a proposal.

When Bain’s offer first surfaced, ADK indicated that its partnership with WPP had failed to deliver tangible benefits and positioned itself as needing to break free in order to realise future ambitions, particularly regarding digital transformation and international growth.

WPP hits back in its statement, suggesting incompetence on ADK’s part. From WPP’s perspective, ADK’s management “consistently resisted opportunities to improve the performance of its overseas operations and exploration of significant digital opportunities, preferring to invest in disastrous acquisitions and consolidations such as Gonzo and Bungeisha”, selling DAC for too low a price and reducing its stake in Video Research Interactive.

Beyond stating its belief that ADK has acted improperly, WPP does not directly raise the possibility of legal action. However, in its statement dated 4 October, Silchester pointed to a “significant risk of litigation” if ADK and WPP fail to reach an agreement.

ADK did not immediately respond to request for comment on WPP's statement.

Source:
Campaign Japan

Related Articles

Just Published

6 hours ago

Facebook extends 'more together' thought with ...

Watch the film conceptualised by Taproot Dentsu here.

6 hours ago

Ogilvy names Liz Taylor as global chief creative ...

Taylor becomes first woman to hold Ogilvy's top creative position.

7 hours ago

Don’t like policing people and if a brand is legal, ...

The Indian actor opens up what he likes and dislikes about advertising, why he’s not on social media, and why he believes OTT is far superior to television

7 hours ago

Airbnb halves performance marketing spend with ...

Total marketing spend fell 45% as Airbnb used 'brand to attract more guests via direct or unpaid channels'.