David Blecken
Oct 12, 2017

ADK 'resisted opportunities', preferring 'disastrous' investments: WPP

Accusations fly as the ADK-WPP saga turns ugly.

WPP CEO Sir Martin Sorrell (AFP)
WPP CEO Sir Martin Sorrell (AFP)

Resistance to Bain Capital’s bid to buy ADK is intensifying, with WPP accusing the Japanese company of having “improperly attempted to terminate its cooperation and business alliance”.

In a new statement, WPP notes that ADK’s sale of its 2.4 percent stake in WPP, which is worth around US$576 million, goes against shareholder advice and would trigger “damaging” tax charges and cancel promised dividends.

WPP’s aggressive statement follows one from ADK on Tuesday that aimed to clarify its position on the matter and reiterated its support for Bain’s $1.35 billion offer. ADK also refuted the idea that termination of its partnership is invalid, claiming “either party may terminate [it] at any time by giving not less than 12 months’ written notice”.

In its statement, WPP reinforced its own position: that the tender offer “significantly undervalues ADK”. Silchester International Investors, ADK’s second-largest shareholder, has also publicly expressed that view.

See all our coverage of the ADK-WPP fight over Bain's bid

WPP also takes issue with ADK’s apparent failure to seriously explore alternatives to Bain’s offer. It suggests the board acted purely out of self-interest and ignored options that could benefit stakeholders. ADK claims to have “sounded out” other potential buyers, but admitted that Bain was the only one to make a proposal.

When Bain’s offer first surfaced, ADK indicated that its partnership with WPP had failed to deliver tangible benefits and positioned itself as needing to break free in order to realise future ambitions, particularly regarding digital transformation and international growth.

WPP hits back in its statement, suggesting incompetence on ADK’s part. From WPP’s perspective, ADK’s management “consistently resisted opportunities to improve the performance of its overseas operations and exploration of significant digital opportunities, preferring to invest in disastrous acquisitions and consolidations such as Gonzo and Bungeisha”, selling DAC for too low a price and reducing its stake in Video Research Interactive.

Beyond stating its belief that ADK has acted improperly, WPP does not directly raise the possibility of legal action. However, in its statement dated 4 October, Silchester pointed to a “significant risk of litigation” if ADK and WPP fail to reach an agreement.

ADK did not immediately respond to request for comment on WPP's statement.

Source:
Campaign Japan

Related Articles

Just Published

3 hours ago

Red Havas announces major restructure

Red Havas has merged its health agencies in Europe and the US with individual health comms professionals across the Asia Pacific region to create the single unified brand Red Havas Health, it announced today.

3 hours ago

Does ‘brand purpose’ messaging actually impact ...

A recent study by Vrity shows taking stances on social issues does increase purchase propensity.

3 hours ago

Disney beefs up ad sales technology

Walt Disney Co. announced a suite of new products and a plan to rapidly automate its ad sales business across linear and digital platforms.

3 hours ago

MDC’s Mark Penn: “CMOs are in ‘get back to ...

The holding company reported a roughly 14% organic revenue drop in 2020, but says things are turning a corner from the worst of the pandemic.