David Wolf
Jul 21, 2010

Time has come to debunk the myth of 'Brand China'

David Wolf, CEO of Wolf Group Asia, explores the topic of 'Brand China' as a major discussion point among marketers over the last decade.

Time has come to debunk the myth of 'Brand China'

For a decade at least, a major topic among marketers in Asia has been ‘Brand China'. If only the nation would improve its image overseas, our thinking has gone, China's diplomatic leverage would grow, its worldwide commercial opportunities would explode, and its companies would be thrust into the ranks of the Fortune 500.

The idea that branding could speed the destiny of the world's largest nation offers marketers self-affirmation and comfort. But if history is any guide, the case for ‘Brand China' has been overstated at best, and at worst is pap.

Let us examine the commercial case - the idea that a national brand creates global opportunity for home-grown companies. Actually, the evidence of history argues for the reverse, suggesting that it is the excellence of home-grown companies and their products that form the foundation for a national brand.

In the case of Japan, the global impression of Japanese goods in the decades following World War II was that they were of poor quality. But a handful of companies, driven by domestic competition and inspired by American quality expert W. Edwards Deming, reversed that impression. Until a recent spate of foul-ups, Japan's global competitive position was sustained by the efforts of individual firms, despite 20 years of political and economic stagnation. We do not speak of brand Japan, but we do speak of Japanese brands.

Similarly, Korea's national image (from a business standpoint) is based heavily on the small handful of local conglomerates that have made themselves leaders in a range of industries, including Samsung, LG, and Hyundai. And, lest you think this issue is limited to Asia, we don't talk about brand France or brand Germany, because the commercial appeal of those countries has been built on brands such as Louis Vuitton, BMW, and Airbus.

Perhaps the argument is best supported by the case of the US. Despite a growing global disenchantment with America, the nation's remaining global reputation is being sustained by, among others, Apple, Boeing, Amazon, Intel and Motorola.

Commercial opportunity cannot be divorced from national action, but China's global commercial opportunities will be determined by the behaviour of its companies, and it is there that we should focus.

This article was originally published in the 15 July 2010 issue of Media.

Related Articles

Just Published

3 hours ago

Nielsen names global chief marketing and communicati...

Jamie Moldafsky will spearhead the integrated global function for Nielsen’s global media business.

4 hours ago

Australian marketers set to lose US$738 million to ...

EXCLUSIVE: Click fraud targeting small businesses and affiliate marketing fraud have become particularly problematic in Australia over the past year, as fraudsters have exposed flaws in cybersecurity defences.

4 hours ago

Unilever to test four-day working week in NZ

Employees will slash their working hours by 20% on the same payroll.

5 hours ago

TBWA bags top honours in AOY APAC and network ...

The Omnicom agency scores Creative and Digital Network of the Year titles while UM wins big in the Media category.