Emily Tan
Nov 3, 2017

P&G slashed number of sites it ran on by 70% after YouTube brand-safety scandal

Only 922 sites of the 1,565 sites P&G advertised on survived the cull, a carryover rate of only 59%.

Marc Pritchard
Marc Pritchard

In April, a month or so after brands were accused of funding terrorist videos on YouTube, Procter & Gamble cut down the number of sites its ads ran on by 69.7%.

The scandal, which broke in the UK in February, led to advertisers either pulling their campaigns or threatening to do so.

P&G froze YouTube spend but has since returned to YouTube's preferred channels.

However, even before the scandal broke, P&G's global chief brand officer Mark Pritchard had been urging the industry to band together to demand media transparency.

MediaRadar's ad tracking software has found that since that plunge, P&G has been gradually building up the number of sites it runs its ads on.

In May the number of sites was down 38% year-on-year, and by June only by 7%. In July, the sites were back on growth at 14% and in August they were up by 21%.

Nevertheless, for the months between January and August, P&G has run its ads on 20% fewer sites overall (1,251 sites), compared with the same period last year,

"The YouTube situation seemed to have startled P&G," Todd Krizelman, chief executive and co-founder of MediaRadar, said. "They ended up reducing the number of sites that they were running ads on – not just with YouTube, but in general. The numbers have bounced back dramatically since then, but the data suggests YouTube had a chilling effect."

He explained: "P&G has gained more transparency over its campaigns, which has resulted in a bounceback.

"They’re the biggest advertiser in the US and one of the biggest in the world. If they want more transparency, agencies, vendors and publishers are going to deliver it. Because of this, media partners have been compelled to install more brand safety measures in an effort to retain and win new business from P&G."

Only 922 sites of the 1,565 sites P&G advertised on survived the cull, a reduction of 69.7% and a carryover rate of only 59%.

"In the eyes of advertisers, transparency is more important than ever before," Krizelman added. "Brands are demanding increased transparency from their partners and cutting ties with those who don’t meet their strict standards. Our data shows that advertisers have become much more cautious with their campaigns, as many have reduced the number of sites they buy on."

Source:
Campaign UK

Related Articles

Just Published

21 hours ago

Crash Course: How to market to consumers during Ramadan

The month of Ramadan is fertile ground for brands as both a key shopping event and an opportunity to align with the key tenets such as Zakat. How can brands tap this opportunity in a thoughtful way, and how has Covid-19 altered Ramadan behaviours?

21 hours ago

Uncle Tobys attacks green juices, reality TV ...

The Nestle brand pairs up with Ogilvy Sydney in a bid to inspire the country to ‘wake the fake up’.

22 hours ago

Mural project beautifies cities in more ways than one

INSPIRATION STATION: A Converse initiative sees young artists in cities around the world creating works of art that feed the soul while also cleaning the air.

22 hours ago

Publicis CEO on growth and Epsilon's instrumental role

Arthur Sadoun speaks to Campaign after reporting organic revenue growth of 2.8% in the first three months of 2021.