Staff Reporters
Jul 8, 2019

Chanel unexpectedly loses ‘Double C’ trademark infringement case in China

A Chinese jewelry shop owner who sells goods with a logo similar to Chanel's "Double C" was not misleading customers, a Guangzhou court ruled.

Chanel unexpectedly loses ‘Double C’ trademark infringement case in China

Chanel unexpectedly lost a southern China court trademark infringement case, striking a blow to the luxury brand's ambitious counterfeit battle.

Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court recently ruled that a jewelry shop owner in South China’ Guangdong Province didn’t infringe Chanel’s exclusive rights to the use of its registered trademark (frequently seen as “Double C”).

The court said that there is no evidence of any circumstances to indicate that the defendant, recognized surnamed Ye, was misleading consumers when his shop was selling the jewelry products in dispute. Neither was there evidence to indicate that Ye labeled his products as Chanel’s so that consumers would have mistakenly believed they were buying Chanel products.

The topic is trending on Weibo – China’s Twitter-like microblog. Under the hashtag #chanelfailed (#香奈儿败诉 in Chinese), many users support Chanel, with one user named “嗯你想干嘛” commenting: “It seems foreign brands never win a trademark case against domestic brands.” Another user named "微笑De弧度本人" added, "Of course the shop uses products similar to the Chanel logo to attract consumers! Otherwise, why is it so similar!"

The judgement is the latest in a long history of Chanel legal action against the jewelry shop owner dating back to June 2016.

In 2014, Ye set up a store selling branded jewelry as “Zhou Baifu”. Then in June 2016, the local industry and commerce regulator went to inspect Ye’s store after receiving clues that the shop sold goods suspected of trademark infringement. After a Chanel representative confirmed on the spot that the goods in dispute had infringed the French brand’s “Double C” trademark, Ye was fined by the government department 80,000 yuan (US$11,636) with relevant products confiscated.

Comparison of Chanel logo and Ye's. Photo from Forbes China Weibo account

Months later, Chanel filed a lawsuit to Zhuhai court on the grounds of trademark infringement, and the court ordered Ye to compensate Chanel 60,000 yuan (US$8,727) as damages.

Unsatisfied with the results of first instance judgement, Ye appealed to Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court, claiming Chanel’s representative’s confirmation was not credible. After the hearing, the court ruled that Chanel didn’t provide sufficient evidence that Ye took advantage of its products’ similarity to Chanel’s logo in promoting its goods, and therefore cancelled the first judgement.

Chanel continues to actively fight to protect its trademark internationally. In 2018, Chanel filed a lawsuit in Michigan, USA against local brand 'Shanel Fashion', asking the court to order 'Shanel' to stop using the name, which Chanel alleged is connected with its own brand phonetically.

Last November, Chanel sued luxury retail platform The RealReal in a trademark infringement and counterfeiting lawsuit, accusing the site of selling counterfeit Chanel handbags.

Related Articles

Just Published

4 hours ago

Ikea rents tiny Tokyo flat for tiny price

In a campaign by Wieden Kennedy Tokyo, the brand's property agent (a walking, talking shark) wants to get someone into a 10-square-meter apartment for just 99 yen per month.

4 hours ago

Finding digital measurement success, part 1: ...

Quantcast's SEA MD argues that every metric you look at, every audience you try to reach, and every methodology you use must be evaluated as part of a cohort.

4 hours ago

With mixed travel recovery in APAC, Hilton focuses ...

Campaign sentiment has shifted from dreaming of a vacation to pushing consumers to graduate from weekend trips to weeklong adventures, says Ben George the chain's senior VP and commercial director.

5 hours ago

Chinese consumers getting more conscious of their ...

TOP OF THE CHARTS: Chinese consumers increasingly choose to make conscious buying decisions by purchasing ethical, environmentally friendly and local products, a report shows.