
It was a year of closures, downsizing and reduced ad pages for
Asia's print media players, buffeted by the twin disasters of a global
slowdown and the terrorist attacks on the US. But then, few expected to
match last year's outrageous performance after the bottom fell out of
the dotcom and telecom industries.
The closure of AOL Time Warner's weekly news and business title,
Asiaweek, following a high profile relaunch earlier this year, caps what
has been a tumultuous year for the region's print media.
Coming off the outrageously inflated 2000, few expected to match last
year's performance. Indeed, titles had expected to see earnings moderate
this year, but the terrorist attacks on the US jolted the world like
never before, resulting in adspend coming to a virtual standstill in the
weeks after September 11.
The demise of Asiaweek closely followed rumours about the magazine being
folded into its sister title, Time Asia. Only weeks prior to that, rival
publication Far Eastern Economic Review (FEER) - now hailed as the last
bastion of locally-produced English language weekly news in Asia - had
seen its editorial team merged with the Asian Wall Street Journal (AWSJ)
and 25 per cent of the combined staff laid off.
If magazines across the region had not implemented a hiring freeze prior
to September 11, they certainly did immediately afterwards.
The budget cuts and lay-offs have raised concerns over whether magazines
will be able to maintain the quality of editorial going forward, and to
continue to develop the editorial product, introduce new content
elements and supplements - items that are likely to attract advertisers.
The Economist's regional advertising manager Tim Pinnegar wonders if
certain titles are going to be able to maintain editorial quality in a
region where resources are already stretched. "A lot of companies have
been giving away free copies of their publications to push circulation.
But without subscription fees and now ad revenue, they are going to get
into trouble."
Media buyers voiced other concerns. "One of the issues we are going to
put a watch on is the combining of editorial departments," comments
CIA's general manager Tess Caven in Singapore. "We're a bit concerned
that this could potentially lead to a lack of variety in the stories
covered and points of view expressed."
Still, some magazines have managed to keep their editorial fresh,
despite the market downturn. The Economist introduced a quarterly
technology section at the end of last year and underwent a redesign in
May and then saw its circulation hit a million for the first time in
September; both the AWSJ and FEER had their own facelifts and redesigns
earlier in the year with the former also introducing a technology
section and the latter increasing its coverage of China. Reader's Digest
updated its cover look and format, launching a practical advice
section.
Despite improvements, the numbers show just how tough the year has been
for most, with very few exceptions. Eventhough the latest CMR
International figures, tracking January to September, did not fully
factor in the full impact on ad revenue of the US tragedies, it still
paints a pretty gloomy picture for the region's print media. Asiaweek's
fall in revenue for the January to September 2001 period against last
year of just over 22 per cent, was by no means the greatest revenue
slump, going by the performance of its regional competitors.
The handful of titles that had a very good year, at least up until
September 11, included Fortune China,which banked just over 50 per cent
more in revenues compared to last year, and Reader's Digest scored a win
with a 35.7 per cent increase.
Indeed, Reader's Digest has been remarkably resilient. Despite
aggressive targets based on an extraordinary year in 2000, the title
expects to surpass budgets, according to associate publisher Peter
Jeffery. Now in its third quarter, based on a financial year that closes
in June, the publication had its best-ever performance in December after
38 years of operating in Asia. Asia's biggest-selling title, with a
combined circulation of 1.2 million was 18 per cent up on revenue
compared with any previous edition, with its three regional editions
closing the year at record levels.
For others, there were also silver linings in the cloud. Despite
Fortune's low revenue figures, its marketing director, Stan Stalnaker,
said 2001 still turned out as the magazine's "second best year ever".
The magazine doubled ad revenue from three or four years ago. "We're
pretty much on target," says Stalnaker. "From an ad page standpoint you
see a drop, but we're on target - 2000 was just outrageous so we knew
that this year was going to be different."
Fortune's Business Life and Most Powerful Women in Business special
editions were key factors which contributed to the bottom line. The
former attracted ad dollars from the luxury goods and lifestyle market,
and the editorial pulling power of the latter brought a wider base of
advertisers on board.
"It had extreme local relevance; it was an eagerly anticipated issue and
advertisers were keen to come in," Stalnaker says.
Regional finance magazine, CFO Asia has also had a comparatively good
year, so much so that it has been able to invest in a spin-off title in
China, CFO China, which launches next March and which marks the first
time ever that an Economist publication has launched a non-English
language title. "We've had a good year," says CFO Asia ad director Simon
Cholmeley.
"We're up on pages year-on-year; it's been a tough market but we've
managed to do well."
At Newsweek, its two special editions of the year helped the title pull
in ad dollars in what has also been a difficult year for the
magazine.
Advertising director, Theresa Yeung, said the plan was to build up its
Issues Asia and the year-end Issues 2002 as brand extensions under the
Newsweek umbrella given their strong advertising pull. The former is the
second and the latter the third in a series of annual reviews of Asian
and global issues. Issues 2002 hit newsstands this month and will remain
on sale through to February 2002.
In all, Yeung said 670,000 copies will be distributed worldwide. The
issue was supported by 42 advertisers, bringing in US$2 million
in revenues.
Had the US attacks not occured, Yeung said the magazine was on track to
hitting 2000's revenue levels, which would have been a respectable
performance considering market conditions this year.
"What really affected us was September 11. Before that, the numbers
weren't looking too bad. We were at about 2000 levels, which was one of
our best years in the past four to five years," says Yeung.
Since the attacks, Yeung said the market has been on a slow mend.
November turned out to be surprisingly strong and she expected to end
the year marginally off on last year.
Business Week described the year as a challenge but it moved to offset
the technology slump by focusing on new categories of advertisers -
including lifestyle consumer products and investment companies - and
enhancing the cooperation with its conference partners in order to
produce more special sections and advertorials.
Alan Lammin, the publication's vice-president and managing director of
Asian operations, said he would be building on this strategy for next
year.
"We have to be more creative and adaptive because we're not getting a
clear visibility on clients' marketing plans. I believe that there is a
lot of pent-up demand out there but the watchword for the moment is
caution," he said.
But while Business Week is digging into a holding pattern in Asia,
Business Week China is going from strength to strength.
Lammin says the rate base will be increased from 74,000 to 80,000 next
month and the magazine has recently introduced a limited amount of local
content, penned by scholars and opinion leaders.
It goes without saying that magazines are eager to put 2001 behind them
and to try to get through the first half of next year. "In January,
no-one would have predicted September 11," says The Economist's
Pinnegar.
The Economist itself lost just under 20 per cent in ad revenue this
year.
"Anyone who set budgets in January for 2001 won't be near them."
The biggest advertisers this year across the board for regional players
have fallen into the following categories (the order of importance
varying from one magazine to another); computers, online and internet,
telecommunications, financials and corporate.
But the sectors that the publications are bracing themselves for - in
fact, banking on if they are going to survive the next year - are the
ones that have stayed away post-September 11, the travel and hospitality
industry and, to a greater extent than now, the financial
institutions.
The campaigns that have stood out the most in the industry's eyes have
been those that have intelligently and cost effectively exploited as
many available media as possible. The key word this year was undoubtedly
integration.
Singapore Airlines' campaign with AOL Time Warner, which saw it run a
multimedia promotion that included a large viral component for its new
Chicago route, was cited as making a very smart use of money and
media.
Liquor companies also aggressively pushed two key brands, Martell and
Chivas Regal, across the mainstream media, again using print as just one
component of a wider, integrated campaign. Sponsorship opportunities
were also crucial in getting the brand message out, with Chivas Regal
running bar and club guides in The Economist as well as advertorials
that tied in with its other promotions in Newsweek.
Time Asia staged a coup for Sony in its special double edition on Asia,
by allowing Sony product placement and accompanying advertorial content
that effectively positioned the Japanese electronics giant as the
corporate sponsor, without actually having to pay a premium for it. The
media agency was CIA.
"We did an ambush sponsorship by placing some advertorial pages
welcoming readers to the special - it made it look as if Sony was
sponsoring it," remarks CIA's Caven. "Sony was thrilled with it."
She adds that the publications that will win out next year will be those
allowing for more unconventional creative executions. They will be
flexible to new ideas and are willing to go beyond the 'norm'.
Time and Reader's Digest are two publications that spring to mind as
both already fit the bill, according to Caven. Of Reader's Digest, Caven
says: "They are proactive, very flexible, very creative -they've got
more to bring to the party like DM, online - and they offer more than
just cheap rates."
Reader's Digest's Jeffery said the title invested in sales, marketing
and research and played up its strengths as a direct marketing
organisation to pull in a range of new advertisers.
"Certainly our consistent message to clients is that we have a
responsible audience and can deliver more of their customers. It's not
just about delivering the numbers though as we have been putting
together some terrific integrated programmes and creative ideas," says
Jeffery.
As far as rates go, depending on who you talk to, they have either been
slashed all over the place by "weaker" magazines or have been
steadfastly kept at rate card -or standard discount - levels by the
likes of The Economist and AWSJ. But The Economist's Pinnegar admits
that this adherence to rate card prices may have lost it some
business.
"There are always magazines that discount and those that don't,"
counters Karin Galley Dick, general manager MindShare Singapore. "But
what everybody is looking for is added value, cover wraps, sponsorship
programmes and so on. I don't think we're seeing any great creative
executions though in regional print."
Looking ahead, publications are positive, but prudent, predicting single
digit growth figures at best. "We've been up and down," says Phil
Revzin, vice-president international at Dow Jones. "But the bottom line
for us is we're here to stay. We're not at all spooked by this
market."
Next year will be tough for Asia's print media, the first half in
particular.
But while publications are bracing themselves for more tough times ahead
in the next six months, with further consolidation and a tighter rein on
adspend, there does appear to be a light at the end of the tunnel,
namely when absentee advertisers get back in the game.
"Next year will be a really challenging year, but there are still key
opportunities out there," muses Fortune's Stalnaker, concluding: "The
world doesn't end in a day."
FEELING THE PINCH: HOW PRINT FARED BETWEEN JAN - SEPT '01
USdollars USdollars 2001 vs
Jan- Jan- 2000 %
Sep 2000 Sep 2001 USdollars
ASIAN WALL STREET JOURNAL 44,609,387 36,587,037 (8,022,350) -18.0
TIME ASIA 41,206,030 34,891,847 (6,314,183) -15.3
NEWSWEEK ASIA 28,242,006 24,732,803 (3,509,203) -12.4
ASIAWEEK 19,778,228 15,382,540 (4,395,688) -22.2
BUSINESS WEEK 15,226,948 10,644,163 (4,582,785) -30.1
FAR EASTERN ECONOMIC REVIEW 13,928,784 10,984,722 (2,944,062) -21.1
FORTUNE 13,274,266 10,098,165 (3,176,101) -23.9
THE ECONOMIST 11,481,850 9,191,750 (2,290,100) -19.9