Feb 13, 2004

BRANDING: Comment - 'Made in China' not a negative for savvy consumers of today

There are numerous dinner table discussions about the rising power of Chinese brands. The basic logic of these discussions comes down to the following consumer logic: if China is making everything, then Chinese brands must be as good as foreign brands, because they are made in the same place.

BRANDING: Comment - 'Made in China' not a negative for savvy consumers of today

This would imply that a brand's country of origin is becoming less significant an issue in the minds of the Chinese consumer. Academic research has shown that a brand's origin can add or detract from that brand's image. So, if you can link your brand to an appropriate origin, then you can enhance your brand's credentials. Globally, there are many brands which, chameleon-like, look like they are from somewhere else. At launch, Giordano was a good name for a fashion brand. Minere sounds French even though it is a water from Thailand. Other brands talk about being 'styled in Italy' or 'containing German technology'.

In 1998, TBWA completed a quantitative survey on country positionings in China. An interesting result of this research was that only two countries stand for a particular product class: Switzerland equals watches and Australia equals dairy. No other country, at that time, was positioned by products.

However, Chinese consumers did have a strong perception of the qualities they associate with products from specific countries. In 2003, ChinaLoop and TBWA\Shanghai launched 'Guan'; a quarterly, internet-based survey.

Last December, Guan specifically looked at 'country of origin' effects.

What is significant in this survey is that the relative positionings of countries by product attributes has not changed. Australia is still positioned around the attribute of 'natural'. Germany still stands for products which are well crafted and of high quality.

As we acknowledge the increasing credibility of Chinese brands like Haier, it is interesting to note how China, as a brand, has tracked in the past five years. Whereas in 1998 China was not clearly positioned against any specific attribute, in 2003 the country was in a similar position to Taiwan and associated with three key attributes: 'for Chinese', 'practical' and 'value for money'.

So who is leading who? It could be argued that a country's positioning is significantly affected by its brands.

For example, the global stature of Toyota and Sony has a significant impact on other Japanese brands. We would expect TCL, Haier, Bird and other Chinese brands to have a similar effect on 'made in China'. 'Country of origin' is not important for all product classes. As a consumer in Beijing said: "I worry about the country of origin when I'm buying expensive stuff like cosmetics, high fashion clothes and high tech stuff." Which partly explains why some of the early China successes like Giordano sound Italian, Haier German and Maxam cosmetics sounds European.

Source:
Campaign Asia
Tags

Related Articles

Just Published

1 day ago

Agency Report Cards 2024: We grade 25 APAC networks

The grades are in for Campaign Asia's 22nd annual evaluation of APAC agency networks. Subscribe to read our detailed analyses.

1 day ago

Agency Report Card 2024: Initiative

After losing marquee clients Amazon and Lego, Initiative faces an uphill battle to rebuild its reputation, leaning on new tools, a "challenger" mindset, and a focus on e-commerce to stay competitive in a rapidly shifting industry.

1 day ago

Global CEO of WPP Media’s Nexus departs

Bidon has been global chief executive at Nexus since April 2022.

1 day ago

Mark Read: 'People are happier when they’re in the ...

WPP’s chief executive spoke at SWSW and touched on hybrid working, the future of the workforce with AI and whether brands will return to X.