Babar Khan Javed
Mar 2, 2018

Did Kylie Jenner really destroy $1.5 billion in Snapchat value?

Are key opinion leaders really that powerful? Well, no. Here are five actual reasons Snapchat's stock dropped.

Did Kylie Jenner really destroy $1.5 billion in Snapchat value?

Last week, mainstream media outlets such as CNN, Reuters, and The Verge reported that Snapchat's stock dropped, taking $1.5 billion or roughly 3% of the company's market capitalisation with it, due to a tweet by Kylie Jenner.

Like most matters in the world, the real story is not so simple. Here's what actually happened.

1. Despised UX

Two weeks before the tweet, Snapchat revamped its user interface, user experience, and app navigation, angering users across the world. A petition on Change.org has been signed nearly 1.3 million times, demanding the changes be reversed.

2. Evan Spiegel

Tuesday, two days before the tweet, the co-founder and CEO of Snapchat sold $50 million of his shares. The revelation started the decline in shares.

3. Wall Street

Wednesday, the day before the tweet, Citigroup downgraded Snapchat's stock from 'neutral' to 'sell'. This was because Snapchat said that it anticipated a decline in user base growth for 2018, adding that acquisition plays a vital role in the platform's ability to monetize. Prominent analysts also factored in the risk of Snapchat's dependence on mobile operating systems, hardware, networks, regulations, and standards that it doesn't control.

4. Negative reviews

App Annie reported that 86% of the reviews left for Snapchat in the month of February 2018 were 1 star.

5. Google Cloud

In a filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, Snapchat referred to its reliance on Google Cloud for computing, storage, bandwidth, and other services, as a major risk factor, costing the company $400 million per year. The filing stated that "any disruption of or interference with our use of the Google Cloud operation would negatively affect our operations and seriously harm our business."

So, sorry Kylie, you're not that influential. A combination of factors led analysts, investors, brokers, and speculators to shed their stakes in the company, causing the share-price drop. There's always a lot more to a story.

By the way, reports this week indicate that Snapchat's downloads are growing (perhaps thanks to the 'bad' publicity) and its stock is recovering


Babar Khan Javed is Campaign's APAC technology editor.

Source:
Campaign Asia
Tags

Related Articles

Just Published

1 day ago

AI, copyright, and creativity: The fine line ...

With tech giants lobbying for AI training on copyrighted material and artists filing lawsuits to protect their work, adland faces the challenge of integrating AI while respecting copyright, originality, and the livelihoods of creators.

1 day ago

Women to Watch 2024: Vivian Liu, DeVries Global

A PR veteran, Liu empowers the next generation in Taiwan by promoting fairness, authenticity, and industry excellence.

1 day ago

A new campaign gives dignity to Vietnam's unsung heroes

This Labour Day, a powerful tribute by creative agency The Friday urges us to see the workers we pass by without a second thought. But does recognition go far enough?

1 day ago

Amazon unveils first brand overhaul in 25 years, ...

The subtle design refresh spans over 50 sub-brands across categories like pharmacy, groceries, and on-demand streaming under a single brand umbrella.