Ben Bold
Jul 26, 2019

P&G not interested in marrying into one ad holding company

Unlike rival Unilever, the FMCG giant will continue to have relationships directly with agencies.

P&G not interested in marrying into one ad holding company

Procter & Gamble will not follow in the footsteps of Unilever and stop working with individual agencies in favour of only partnering with holding companies.

In June Unilever chief executive Alan Jope said it was two-thirds of the way through shifting its brand relationships to the holding company level rather than the individual sub-brands. The new arrangements will be company-wide.

The move by the Anglo-Dutch FMCG giant sparked speculation on whether other major companies would follow suit.

But the new model does not tempt P&G, which described its own approach as "having flexibility in [its] models beyond holding companies". Procter & Gamble owns brands including Head & Shoulders, Always and Pampers.

In a statement, a spokeswoman said: "We will continue having relationships with individual agencies, their holding groups and then a broad spectrum of other partners in order to fulfil our desire to raise creative standards."

The spokeswoman said P&G chief brand officer Marc Pritchard has "talked publicly about our approach to a fixed flow model". The set-up "takes agency (and holding groups) flexibility to an even more agile model by recognising that there are many more sources of creativity available today", such as via entertainment and film, she said.

"Simply put, P&G is looking for the best creative partners," the spokeswoman added.

In the UK an interdisciplinary Publicis Groupe team, PG One, handles some of P&G’s creative alongside all of its media. Other agencies including WPP’s Grey London also work on creative accounts.

A spokesman for Kraft Heinz declined to clarify its position on holding company-wide arrangements.

Back in June, speaking to Campaign at Cannes Lions, Jope said the FMCG giant was not looking to increase or decrease the number of agencies on its roster, but instead, it was structuring its relationships with holding companies.

He continued: "I know that WPP have got all the talent that we need to solve our brand problems, and so do Omnicom, so do Interpublic. What I don’t want to do is just have a relationship with one narrow vertical just within WPP."

Unilever's move was described by some agencies as risking a focus on efficiency over effectiveness.  

Source:
Campaign UK

Related Articles

Just Published

1 day ago

Purpose, laughs, and boppable tunes: Spikes jury ...

SPIKES ASIA X CAMPAIGN: Presidents and members of several Spikes Asia juries share the top trends they spotted in the jury Zoom rooms, with video examples.

1 day ago

Crash Course: How to tell engaging short-form stories

To round off a week of creativity-themed content during Spikes Asia X Campaign festival, this Crash Course provides useful tips on how to build story arcs and create thumb-stopping campaigns for short-form.

1 day ago

Lessons from Tesla, Apple and yoga (yes, yoga) in ...

SPIKES ASIA X CAMPAIGN: Creatives need to drive relevance for sustainable options, instead of virtue-signalling about sustainability, argues Gulshan Singh of FCB Interface.

1 day ago

Spikes Asia Awards 2021: Campaign's contenders 3

As the juries make their final selections ahead of the March 1 winners announcement, Campaign Asia-Pacific's editorial team has once again scoured through the 2021 shortlist to pick out the work we expect to win.