Pitcher queries Ogilvy's rise to top of China rankings

<p>HONG KONG: Saatchi & Saatchi has challenged a Hong Kong 4A's China </p><p>ranking, which pushed his agency off the top spot for the first time in </p><p>six years. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>According to the 4A's, Ogilvy & Mather is the biggest agency on the </p><p>mainland with capitalised billings last year of HKdollars 1.15 billion </p><p>(about USdollars 148 million), compared with Saatchi's HKdollars 1.11 </p><p>billion. Saatchi's Asia chief executive Patrick Pitcher said that O&M </p><p>pipped his agency with an 84 per cent growth in production income, which </p><p>he questioned as being "extremely high when the industry average, </p><p>excluding O&M, is around 12 per cent". </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>O&M regional chairman Miles Young countered by saying: "The production </p><p>income category includes fees, as opposed to media commissions, and the </p><p>growth in fees was very strong last year with around 60 per cent of our </p><p>clients in China on fees, including IBM, Kodak and Motorola. And that </p><p>was on top of a large pool of interactive business." </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Pitcher, however, is refusing to concede defeat until the publication of </p><p>a similar ranking by the China Advertising Association next month, which </p><p>he claimed is more accurate because all figures are based on taxes </p><p>paid. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, second-placed DDB has closed the gap with O&M </p><p>(dollars 1.29 billion) to just dollars 8 million. </p><p><BR><BR> </p>

HONG KONG: Saatchi & Saatchi has challenged a Hong Kong 4A's China

ranking, which pushed his agency off the top spot for the first time in

six years.



According to the 4A's, Ogilvy & Mather is the biggest agency on the

mainland with capitalised billings last year of HKdollars 1.15 billion

(about USdollars 148 million), compared with Saatchi's HKdollars 1.11

billion. Saatchi's Asia chief executive Patrick Pitcher said that O&M

pipped his agency with an 84 per cent growth in production income, which

he questioned as being "extremely high when the industry average,

excluding O&M, is around 12 per cent".



O&M regional chairman Miles Young countered by saying: "The production

income category includes fees, as opposed to media commissions, and the

growth in fees was very strong last year with around 60 per cent of our

clients in China on fees, including IBM, Kodak and Motorola. And that

was on top of a large pool of interactive business."



Pitcher, however, is refusing to concede defeat until the publication of

a similar ranking by the China Advertising Association next month, which

he claimed is more accurate because all figures are based on taxes

paid.



Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, second-placed DDB has closed the gap with O&M

(dollars 1.29 billion) to just dollars 8 million.