VIEWPOINT: You show me yours, and then I'll show you mine

<p>Over the past few years, there has been a growing movement on the </p><p>client side for agencies to be more accountable for the campaigns they </p><p>create. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Evidence of this new direction is underlined by the slow but gradual </p><p>change in the way payment is made for advertising services rendered. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Led by the big multinational companies like P&G, clients are </p><p>increasingly calling for the commission structure to be replaced with a </p><p>performance-based fee system. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>It's the client's way of motivating its advertising partners to do the </p><p>best they can - for if the campaign fails, then the agency suffers </p><p>too. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Fair enough, it seems. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>However, the tables have been turned and agencies are now calling for </p><p>accountability of their own from clients. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>In the latest MEDIA-CNBC Asian Advertising Industry Poll (see page 6), </p><p>54 per cent of agencies across the region favoured the introduction of </p><p>pitch fees, with 72 per cent saying the client should pay up to </p><p>US$5,000 per pitch. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>This is more than the HK$20,000 (about US$2,600) per pitch </p><p>recommended earlier this year by the Hong Kong 4As. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>The 4As recommendation, however, fell on sceptical ears - most clients </p><p>stated they wouldn't pay and agencies didn't believe it could be </p><p>enforced. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>This reflects one simple finding of the poll; that almost 50 per cent of </p><p>agencies have never received a pitch fee. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>But it doesn't take much imagination or calculation to realise that </p><p>chasing for new business requires the use of expensive resources. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>According to the poll, 67 per cent of respondents said they pitched </p><p>between six and 20 times per year. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>The amount of money spent, therefore, adds up over time. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Advocates for the pitch fee argue that it would stop clients from </p><p>calling for unnecessary pitches and inviting unnecessarily large numbers </p><p>of agencies to participate. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>It would also stop companies from calling for a pitch with the intent of </p><p>simply stealing ideas. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>These are valid points. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Afterall, everyone wants to be treated fairly. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Even the clients with their push to replace commissions with fees are </p><p>looking for accountability. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>If the clients can demand accountability, so can agencies. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Theoretically, this is true. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>But there are two, sad, irreconcilable realities. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>These are that as long as ad agencies are clamouring for accountability, </p><p>pitch fees can never be enforced under the current environment. </p><p><BR><BR> </p>

Over the past few years, there has been a growing movement on the

client side for agencies to be more accountable for the campaigns they

create.



Evidence of this new direction is underlined by the slow but gradual

change in the way payment is made for advertising services rendered.



Led by the big multinational companies like P&G, clients are

increasingly calling for the commission structure to be replaced with a

performance-based fee system.



It's the client's way of motivating its advertising partners to do the

best they can - for if the campaign fails, then the agency suffers

too.



Fair enough, it seems.



However, the tables have been turned and agencies are now calling for

accountability of their own from clients.



In the latest MEDIA-CNBC Asian Advertising Industry Poll (see page 6),

54 per cent of agencies across the region favoured the introduction of

pitch fees, with 72 per cent saying the client should pay up to

US$5,000 per pitch.



This is more than the HK$20,000 (about US$2,600) per pitch

recommended earlier this year by the Hong Kong 4As.



The 4As recommendation, however, fell on sceptical ears - most clients

stated they wouldn't pay and agencies didn't believe it could be

enforced.



This reflects one simple finding of the poll; that almost 50 per cent of

agencies have never received a pitch fee.



But it doesn't take much imagination or calculation to realise that

chasing for new business requires the use of expensive resources.



According to the poll, 67 per cent of respondents said they pitched

between six and 20 times per year.



The amount of money spent, therefore, adds up over time.



Advocates for the pitch fee argue that it would stop clients from

calling for unnecessary pitches and inviting unnecessarily large numbers

of agencies to participate.



It would also stop companies from calling for a pitch with the intent of

simply stealing ideas.



These are valid points.



Afterall, everyone wants to be treated fairly.



Even the clients with their push to replace commissions with fees are

looking for accountability.



If the clients can demand accountability, so can agencies.



Theoretically, this is true.



But there are two, sad, irreconcilable realities.



These are that as long as ad agencies are clamouring for accountability,

pitch fees can never be enforced under the current environment.