VIEWPOINT: Don't look, but somebody out there is watching you

<p>At the Marcom Asia 2000 seminar in Hong Kong earlier this month, </p><p>Robert Fitzgerald of Web Connection Media used the term "electronic </p><p>stalking" in reference to certain marketing tactics which are being </p><p>deployed on the Internet and related new technology, such as WAP. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Last month, Time magazine featured a cover story about electronic spies </p><p>in cyberspace which "mine" data every time you log on - illegally, and </p><p>without your consent - and send this information back to people who will </p><p>then use it or sell it. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Consumers have long been wary about providing credit card details in </p><p>order to shop online due to security fears; now they have something else </p><p>to worry about. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Such electronic stalking and spying is far more disturbing by their very </p><p>nature: they pretend to exist solely to make your life easier, but their </p><p>methods are sinister. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Internet industry pundits have been trumpeting the fact that online, </p><p>it's the consumer who makes the rules and forces the marketer to play by </p><p>them. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Consumers have the power - or do they? Could it all be just an </p><p>illusion? </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Think about it: increasingly, sites are demanding that users register </p><p>their details before they can proceed beyond a basic level of </p><p>information within that site. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>It is not always clear why this information is requested, or what the </p><p>site owners are going to do with it. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Sure, demographic profiles and so on are vital when it comes to </p><p>obtaining advertising support, but you have to wonder if that is where </p><p>the buck stops. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Another thing to think about: cookies. You can erase them on your </p><p>computer, but haven't you ever wondered if any trace of them remain on </p><p>the server, or if the website has 'tagged' you in some other way which </p><p>you don't know about? </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>George Orwell's predictions might have been a bit premature when he </p><p>wrote 1984, but the days of Big Brother watching our every move are here </p><p>nonetheless. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>If you're fine with that, then there's no problem. But if you don't like </p><p>the idea that someone out there is keeping tabs on you, then something </p><p>needs to be done. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>It would surely behoove the Internet industry to address this situation </p><p>now, before rising consumer opinion forces the issue. </p><p><BR><BR> </p>

At the Marcom Asia 2000 seminar in Hong Kong earlier this month,

Robert Fitzgerald of Web Connection Media used the term "electronic

stalking" in reference to certain marketing tactics which are being

deployed on the Internet and related new technology, such as WAP.



Last month, Time magazine featured a cover story about electronic spies

in cyberspace which "mine" data every time you log on - illegally, and

without your consent - and send this information back to people who will

then use it or sell it.



Consumers have long been wary about providing credit card details in

order to shop online due to security fears; now they have something else

to worry about.



Such electronic stalking and spying is far more disturbing by their very

nature: they pretend to exist solely to make your life easier, but their

methods are sinister.



Internet industry pundits have been trumpeting the fact that online,

it's the consumer who makes the rules and forces the marketer to play by

them.



Consumers have the power - or do they? Could it all be just an

illusion?



Think about it: increasingly, sites are demanding that users register

their details before they can proceed beyond a basic level of

information within that site.



It is not always clear why this information is requested, or what the

site owners are going to do with it.



Sure, demographic profiles and so on are vital when it comes to

obtaining advertising support, but you have to wonder if that is where

the buck stops.



Another thing to think about: cookies. You can erase them on your

computer, but haven't you ever wondered if any trace of them remain on

the server, or if the website has 'tagged' you in some other way which

you don't know about?



George Orwell's predictions might have been a bit premature when he

wrote 1984, but the days of Big Brother watching our every move are here

nonetheless.



If you're fine with that, then there's no problem. But if you don't like

the idea that someone out there is keeping tabs on you, then something

needs to be done.



It would surely behoove the Internet industry to address this situation

now, before rising consumer opinion forces the issue.