VIEWPOINT: Are agencies short-changing China?

<p>The China Advertising Association's new agency ranking figures make </p><p>interesting reading (see p4). Not because they show who the big players </p><p>are - most people knew that anyway. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>No, the interesting thing is that the agencies are ranked by both their </p><p>declared billings and their tax contributions. Theoretically, the names </p><p>on the two lists should be the same. They're not, of course, which may </p><p>or may not confirm that agencies are sometimes over-generous when they </p><p>declare their billings. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>You'd hope that this is the explanation for the discrepancy. If not, </p><p>then some agencies have quite a bit of explaining to do to the Chinese </p><p>tax authorities. </p><p><BR><BR> </p>

The China Advertising Association's new agency ranking figures make

interesting reading (see p4). Not because they show who the big players

are - most people knew that anyway.



No, the interesting thing is that the agencies are ranked by both their

declared billings and their tax contributions. Theoretically, the names

on the two lists should be the same. They're not, of course, which may

or may not confirm that agencies are sometimes over-generous when they

declare their billings.



You'd hope that this is the explanation for the discrepancy. If not,

then some agencies have quite a bit of explaining to do to the Chinese

tax authorities.