VIEWPOINT: Are agencies short-changing China?
<p>The China Advertising Association's new agency ranking figures make </p><p>interesting reading (see p4). Not because they show who the big players </p><p>are - most people knew that anyway. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>No, the interesting thing is that the agencies are ranked by both their </p><p>declared billings and their tax contributions. Theoretically, the names </p><p>on the two lists should be the same. They're not, of course, which may </p><p>or may not confirm that agencies are sometimes over-generous when they </p><p>declare their billings. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>You'd hope that this is the explanation for the discrepancy. If not, </p><p>then some agencies have quite a bit of explaining to do to the Chinese </p><p>tax authorities. </p><p><BR><BR> </p>
Please sign in below or access limited articles a month after free, fast registration.
If you don’t yet have an account, you can register for free to unlock additional content. For full access to everything we offer, view our subscription plans.
Sign In
Register for free
✓ Access limited free articles each month
✓ Email bulletins – top industry news and insights delivered straight to your inbox
Subscribe
✓ Unlimited access to all Campaign Asia content
✓ Real-world campaign case studies and career insights
✓ Exclusive reports, industry news, and annual features