Procter & Gamble wields axe on up to 100 of its least profitable brands
Procter & Gamble announced today that up to 100 of its least profitable brands will be axed as it looks to streamline its costs and focus on its core brands
by Kim Benjamin
Please sign in below or access limited articles a month after free, fast registration.
If you don’t yet have an account, you can register for free to unlock additional content. For full access to everything we offer, view our subscription plans.
Sign In
Trouble signing in?
Register for free
✓ Access limited free articles each month
✓ Email bulletins – top industry news and insights delivered straight to your inbox
Subscribe
✓ Unlimited access to all Campaign Asia content
✓ Real-world campaign case studies and career insights
✓ Exclusive reports, industry news, and annual features