Procter & Gamble adopts bolder advertising strategy to boost sales

<p>In the wake of last week's 30-point plunge in its share price on </p><p>the New York Stock Exchange, Procter and Gamble's decision to emphasise </p><p>integrated marketing, might, industry observers said, be more of a </p><p>cost-cutting exercise rather than a long-overdue change in </p><p>direction. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>The latest of a series of revolutionary moves on the P&G account sees </p><p>the Cincinnati-based conglomerate opening up brand planning and </p><p>development to all of its external marketing and promotional resources </p><p>in the first stage of planning, as of July 1, 2000. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Previously, roster agencies Saatchi & Saatchi, Leo Burnett, D'arcy and </p><p>Grey received first-call briefing on a total annual adspend last </p><p>estimated to be in the region of US$3 billion. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>As reported in the Chicago Tribune at the end of last year, this latest </p><p>initiative invites P&G's public relations, direct marketing, promotions, </p><p>merchandising and interactive consultancies and a further US$1.6 </p><p>billion worth of promotion spend, to sit down with roster agencies at </p><p>first stage briefing with all the money on the same table. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>The move was viewed by many to be another indication of the company's </p><p>commitment to both integrated marketing and greater competition among </p><p>its external marketing divisions. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Timed to coincide with the radical July 1 move to a fee and bonus </p><p>related remuneration system for the company's roster agencies, the new </p><p>era of quantifiable advertising results appeared to be well and truly </p><p>established on the P&G account. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>And, in an unusual twist, the generally perceived "10 miles of bad road" </p><p>creative view of the P&G account, might be turned on its head by the new </p><p>initiatives. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>On the premise that the best creative work produces the best results, </p><p>agencies which do not or cannot put excellent creative resources behind </p><p>the account, suggested Craig Davis, regional creative director for </p><p>Saatchi and Saatchi Asia-Pacific, stand to lose out. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>According to Mr Davis, "The creative door is open" on P&G accounts. What </p><p>remains to be seen was whether the agencies can come up with the </p><p>goods. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>"In the past, P&G did a very good job of looking at what they had </p><p>achieved and what had worked. Reapplying previous successes meant that </p><p>in some cases agencies were working almost to formula. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>"There was no question that P&G recognised that it might have been </p><p>missing opportunities as markets started to develop and other </p><p>competitors came in." </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>P&G sent shock waves through the industry in 1998, when the company </p><p>embarked on a radical internal restructuring programme overturning </p><p>purportedly written-in-stone dictates, which governed every area of the </p><p>FMCG giant's operations. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Speculation among industry onlookers and the world's press has been </p><p>rife. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>It seems most likely, however, that changes came about in response to an </p><p>increase in velocity of its downward-moving share values, which if left </p><p>unattended had the potential to knock the world-wide market leader out </p><p>of the number one slot in its leading categories and markets. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Concern over decreasing share values led to the implementation of a </p><p>wide-range of organisational temperature-gauging exercises, which </p><p>covered all areas of operation, including external marketing resources </p><p>(P&G's agencies) and the creative work being produced. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>What they found, said Mr Davis, was that "their agencies' best work was </p><p>not on their business (and) the agency's best people were not always </p><p>working on their business." </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Employing high-profile creatives on P&G accounts has been a long- time </p><p>policy for Leo Burnett, which in the new guise of BDM now holds 50 per </p><p>cent of P&G's global business. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>According to Andrew Bell, who moved into Leo Burnett's newly-created </p><p>role of regional creative director responsible for P&G hair care based </p><p>in Thailand last year, "The need has been voiced for brands to stand out </p><p>from the crowd in a more meaningful way. Our clients are being asked to </p><p>take risks and make decisions based on gut feeling. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>"The production of rough test commercials is becoming rarer. Our clients </p><p>are more inclined to air and test later." </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Having been recognised as generic to the category (as opposed to brand </p><p>defining), so-called identifying hair shots are gradually disappearing </p><p>from P&G's TV commercials". </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Finer points such as content requirements of hair shots and See-and-Say, </p><p>plus testing procedures such as OAT's and Quick-and-Roughs are the thin </p><p>end of the wedge when it comes to improving creative standards and </p><p>business results in the world of P&G advertising. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>One of the biggest differences - reflecting what Saatchis regional </p><p>planning director for P&G, Danny Logue, described as a fundamental </p><p>attitude shift - is the re-framing of OAT's as a learning and </p><p>development tool that might now happen after the event, rather than a </p><p>pre-requisite which must be passed before a television commercial can </p><p>run. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>The changes at P&G might yet prove to be a bit unsteady, but one that, </p><p>if they can hit the bulls eye, will pay well for the FMCG global </p><p>giant. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>As the Chicago Tribune suggested at the time of the announcement, new </p><p>moves at P&G favour integration which, among other things, typically </p><p>leads to an increase in below-the-line activity. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>This in turn would favour agencies, like BDM (Burnett, Dentsu, McManus), </p><p>which through its union with PR leaders Manning Selvage and Lee can </p><p>display substantial integrated expertise. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>With the new compensation structure due in place by the middle of this </p><p>year, P&G and their roster agencies will, in the words of Saatchi's Mr </p><p>Davis, operate far more as partners than just as agency and client. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>"There's a competitiveness to this new era and Saatchis would like to be </p><p>the agency that makes the most of it." </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>In the long run, the increased emphasis on integration may prove to be </p><p>another kick-in-the-teeth to above-the-line and the creation of TVC </p><p>advertising. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>In the short term, however, opportunities to improve the quality of </p><p>creative produced on P&G accounts, are deemed by all to be </p><p>increasing. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>As Mr Davis put it, "It's for the agencies now to take that opportunity </p><p>and turn it into something". </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Carpe-Diem or 'seize the day' may be the motto for P&G roster agencies </p><p>now, however, whether this translates into higher stock prices remains </p><p>to be seen. </p><p><BR><BR> </p>

In the wake of last week's 30-point plunge in its share price on

the New York Stock Exchange, Procter and Gamble's decision to emphasise

integrated marketing, might, industry observers said, be more of a

cost-cutting exercise rather than a long-overdue change in

direction.



The latest of a series of revolutionary moves on the P&G account sees

the Cincinnati-based conglomerate opening up brand planning and

development to all of its external marketing and promotional resources

in the first stage of planning, as of July 1, 2000.



Previously, roster agencies Saatchi & Saatchi, Leo Burnett, D'arcy and

Grey received first-call briefing on a total annual adspend last

estimated to be in the region of US$3 billion.



As reported in the Chicago Tribune at the end of last year, this latest

initiative invites P&G's public relations, direct marketing, promotions,

merchandising and interactive consultancies and a further US$1.6

billion worth of promotion spend, to sit down with roster agencies at

first stage briefing with all the money on the same table.



The move was viewed by many to be another indication of the company's

commitment to both integrated marketing and greater competition among

its external marketing divisions.



Timed to coincide with the radical July 1 move to a fee and bonus

related remuneration system for the company's roster agencies, the new

era of quantifiable advertising results appeared to be well and truly

established on the P&G account.



And, in an unusual twist, the generally perceived "10 miles of bad road"

creative view of the P&G account, might be turned on its head by the new

initiatives.



On the premise that the best creative work produces the best results,

agencies which do not or cannot put excellent creative resources behind

the account, suggested Craig Davis, regional creative director for

Saatchi and Saatchi Asia-Pacific, stand to lose out.



According to Mr Davis, "The creative door is open" on P&G accounts. What

remains to be seen was whether the agencies can come up with the

goods.



"In the past, P&G did a very good job of looking at what they had

achieved and what had worked. Reapplying previous successes meant that

in some cases agencies were working almost to formula.



"There was no question that P&G recognised that it might have been

missing opportunities as markets started to develop and other

competitors came in."



P&G sent shock waves through the industry in 1998, when the company

embarked on a radical internal restructuring programme overturning

purportedly written-in-stone dictates, which governed every area of the

FMCG giant's operations.



Speculation among industry onlookers and the world's press has been

rife.



It seems most likely, however, that changes came about in response to an

increase in velocity of its downward-moving share values, which if left

unattended had the potential to knock the world-wide market leader out

of the number one slot in its leading categories and markets.



Concern over decreasing share values led to the implementation of a

wide-range of organisational temperature-gauging exercises, which

covered all areas of operation, including external marketing resources

(P&G's agencies) and the creative work being produced.



What they found, said Mr Davis, was that "their agencies' best work was

not on their business (and) the agency's best people were not always

working on their business."



Employing high-profile creatives on P&G accounts has been a long- time

policy for Leo Burnett, which in the new guise of BDM now holds 50 per

cent of P&G's global business.



According to Andrew Bell, who moved into Leo Burnett's newly-created

role of regional creative director responsible for P&G hair care based

in Thailand last year, "The need has been voiced for brands to stand out

from the crowd in a more meaningful way. Our clients are being asked to

take risks and make decisions based on gut feeling.



"The production of rough test commercials is becoming rarer. Our clients

are more inclined to air and test later."



Having been recognised as generic to the category (as opposed to brand

defining), so-called identifying hair shots are gradually disappearing

from P&G's TV commercials".



Finer points such as content requirements of hair shots and See-and-Say,

plus testing procedures such as OAT's and Quick-and-Roughs are the thin

end of the wedge when it comes to improving creative standards and

business results in the world of P&G advertising.



One of the biggest differences - reflecting what Saatchis regional

planning director for P&G, Danny Logue, described as a fundamental

attitude shift - is the re-framing of OAT's as a learning and

development tool that might now happen after the event, rather than a

pre-requisite which must be passed before a television commercial can

run.



The changes at P&G might yet prove to be a bit unsteady, but one that,

if they can hit the bulls eye, will pay well for the FMCG global

giant.



As the Chicago Tribune suggested at the time of the announcement, new

moves at P&G favour integration which, among other things, typically

leads to an increase in below-the-line activity.



This in turn would favour agencies, like BDM (Burnett, Dentsu, McManus),

which through its union with PR leaders Manning Selvage and Lee can

display substantial integrated expertise.



With the new compensation structure due in place by the middle of this

year, P&G and their roster agencies will, in the words of Saatchi's Mr

Davis, operate far more as partners than just as agency and client.



"There's a competitiveness to this new era and Saatchis would like to be

the agency that makes the most of it."



In the long run, the increased emphasis on integration may prove to be

another kick-in-the-teeth to above-the-line and the creation of TVC

advertising.



In the short term, however, opportunities to improve the quality of

creative produced on P&G accounts, are deemed by all to be

increasing.



As Mr Davis put it, "It's for the agencies now to take that opportunity

and turn it into something".



Carpe-Diem or 'seize the day' may be the motto for P&G roster agencies

now, however, whether this translates into higher stock prices remains

to be seen.