DIARY: Rant

<p>Hands up who thinks the new ads for Hong Kong's MTR are any </p><p>good. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Hmm, not many takers. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>For those of media's readers who live outside Hong Kong, here's a quick </p><p>description. In one ad, a child plays forlornly on its own, draws a </p><p>picture and has no one to show it to. Time passes and eventually it's </p><p>bed time. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Later, his father gets home, and realises that he can't play with his </p><p>child. In another execution, a mother plays with her happy baby because </p><p>she took the MTR. Message - if you take the MTR, you have more time for </p><p>family, ie for the important things in your life. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Well, pardon me, but doesn't this miss the point somewhat? What we have </p><p>here is an ad for transport, or maybe for fast transport. What we don't </p><p>really have is an ad for the MTR. Because the campaign seems to imply </p><p>that the MTR's core proposition, its key differentiator, the thing that </p><p>makes it great, is its speed. And that patently isn't true. Don't get me </p><p>wrong, I like the MTR. It's cheap, it's clean, it's efficient. But the </p><p>idea that it's the quickest way to get home is nowhere near the most </p><p>relevant claim its ads could be making. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>It's a problem that so much advertising suffers from: the idea that your </p><p>brand can stand for what you want it to stand for, rather than what it </p><p>actually does stand for and then promoting that. The MTR wants to be </p><p>about making more time for the important things in life, and that leads </p><p>it down the route of ads that try to differentiate it in an irrelevant </p><p>way. Why not promote what the MTR is good at? </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Until the advertising industry, clients and agencies alike, realises </p><p>that its brands and its advertising need to reflect the reality of what </p><p>consumers actually experience when they use products and services, this </p><p>kind of thing will continue. It doesn't build touchy-feely brand </p><p>associations - it just disappears right over people's heads. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Whoever you are, and whatever you want to get off your chest, send your </p><p>rants to rant@media.com.hk, and we'll print them anonymously. </p><p><BR><BR> </p>

Hands up who thinks the new ads for Hong Kong's MTR are any

good.



Hmm, not many takers.



For those of media's readers who live outside Hong Kong, here's a quick

description. In one ad, a child plays forlornly on its own, draws a

picture and has no one to show it to. Time passes and eventually it's

bed time.



Later, his father gets home, and realises that he can't play with his

child. In another execution, a mother plays with her happy baby because

she took the MTR. Message - if you take the MTR, you have more time for

family, ie for the important things in your life.



Well, pardon me, but doesn't this miss the point somewhat? What we have

here is an ad for transport, or maybe for fast transport. What we don't

really have is an ad for the MTR. Because the campaign seems to imply

that the MTR's core proposition, its key differentiator, the thing that

makes it great, is its speed. And that patently isn't true. Don't get me

wrong, I like the MTR. It's cheap, it's clean, it's efficient. But the

idea that it's the quickest way to get home is nowhere near the most

relevant claim its ads could be making.



It's a problem that so much advertising suffers from: the idea that your

brand can stand for what you want it to stand for, rather than what it

actually does stand for and then promoting that. The MTR wants to be

about making more time for the important things in life, and that leads

it down the route of ads that try to differentiate it in an irrelevant

way. Why not promote what the MTR is good at?



Until the advertising industry, clients and agencies alike, realises

that its brands and its advertising need to reflect the reality of what

consumers actually experience when they use products and services, this

kind of thing will continue. It doesn't build touchy-feely brand

associations - it just disappears right over people's heads.



Whoever you are, and whatever you want to get off your chest, send your

rants to rant@media.com.hk, and we'll print them anonymously.