DIARY: Rant

<p>The next time I read an agency boss saying that they're </p><p>"re-allocating resources" or some such rubbish, I'll scream. Come on, </p><p>guys. You're not reallocating anything - you're firing people. People </p><p>know when they've been fired, and telling them that they haven't been </p><p>isn't going to fool anyone. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Why doesn't anyone have the guts to admit that it's really bad out there </p><p>at the moment. Everyone is having to make unpleasant staffing decisions, </p><p>and get rid of people they'd rather keep. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>The reason? Whisper it: no one's making much money at the moment. There </p><p>are hardly any half-decent accounts up for pitch, and every agency is </p><p>finding itself forced to chase after nasty little bits of business that </p><p>frankly it'd rather not have. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>The popular solution is to get rid of staff. Fair enough, you'd think - </p><p>basic economics dictate that if your revenues go down, you want your </p><p>costs to go down as well. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>But what worries me is when an agency loses an account - sometimes not </p><p>even a particularly big one - and immediately kicks 10 of its staff </p><p>out. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>That can only mean one thing: that agency isn't confident that it can </p><p>win other accounts, at least not quickly enough to justify the extra </p><p>staff costs in the meantime. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Every global agency network will tell you that it expects Asia to </p><p>massively grow its contribution to its global revenue over the next few </p><p>years, and they're all more than happy to claim that the region is going </p><p>to become an increasingly important part of their global operations. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>But it's hard to see how that's going to happen if agencies continue to </p><p>slash resources at the slightest provocation - they won't have the </p><p>resources left to grow quickly, and there won't be enough talented, </p><p>experienced people in the market to hire. It's all very well to be </p><p>reactive to market conditions, but there's more than a whiff of </p><p>short-termism about knee-jerk staff cuts. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>You could call agencies' strictness over the financial performance of </p><p>their Asian operations prudence - or you could call it cowardice. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Whoever you are, and whatever you want to get off your chest, send your </p><p>rants to rant@media.com.hk, and we'll print them anonymously. </p><p><BR><BR> </p>

The next time I read an agency boss saying that they're

"re-allocating resources" or some such rubbish, I'll scream. Come on,

guys. You're not reallocating anything - you're firing people. People

know when they've been fired, and telling them that they haven't been

isn't going to fool anyone.



Why doesn't anyone have the guts to admit that it's really bad out there

at the moment. Everyone is having to make unpleasant staffing decisions,

and get rid of people they'd rather keep.



The reason? Whisper it: no one's making much money at the moment. There

are hardly any half-decent accounts up for pitch, and every agency is

finding itself forced to chase after nasty little bits of business that

frankly it'd rather not have.



The popular solution is to get rid of staff. Fair enough, you'd think -

basic economics dictate that if your revenues go down, you want your

costs to go down as well.



But what worries me is when an agency loses an account - sometimes not

even a particularly big one - and immediately kicks 10 of its staff

out.



That can only mean one thing: that agency isn't confident that it can

win other accounts, at least not quickly enough to justify the extra

staff costs in the meantime.



Every global agency network will tell you that it expects Asia to

massively grow its contribution to its global revenue over the next few

years, and they're all more than happy to claim that the region is going

to become an increasingly important part of their global operations.



But it's hard to see how that's going to happen if agencies continue to

slash resources at the slightest provocation - they won't have the

resources left to grow quickly, and there won't be enough talented,

experienced people in the market to hire. It's all very well to be

reactive to market conditions, but there's more than a whiff of

short-termism about knee-jerk staff cuts.



You could call agencies' strictness over the financial performance of

their Asian operations prudence - or you could call it cowardice.



Whoever you are, and whatever you want to get off your chest, send your

rants to rant@media.com.hk, and we'll print them anonymously.