CReATION: Blowing off steam, or just plain hot air?

<p>Over the past few weeks there has been lively debate on these pages </p><p>between some of Asia's leading Internet professionals. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>There have been studies declaring that on-line advertising is </p><p>ineffective, letters arguing that print ads have no better recall than </p><p>on-line, and finally agencies asserting that their campaigns don't </p><p>suffer from declining click-through-rates (CTR). </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>All of the debate though should give us pause, and encourage us to ask: </p><p>is the industry really so fragmented in its opinions? Or is everyone </p><p>simply missing the point? </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>A recent US study may shed some light on the issue. Over the six-month </p><p>period of its Online Advertising Report, AdKnowledge tagged millions of </p><p>Internet users who were exposed to banners ads and then watched their </p><p>behaviour. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>They found that the people who saw an ad, but never clicked, made more </p><p>conversions to on-line sales/actions than the people who had clicked on </p><p>the banners. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>This result reinforces that the return on investment (ROI) for on-line </p><p>advertising is likely much higher than it seems simply from </p><p>click-through-rates. Mr Steve Findley, VP of AdKnoweldge, summed it up </p><p>by claiming that "advertisers that focus only on clicks or even </p><p>post-click conversions may miss vitally important effects of an </p><p>advertising campaign". </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>The element of accountability - being able to develop concrete metrics </p><p>such as cost-per-customer acquired - is the real benefit to come from </p><p>on-line marketing. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>By working together as a unified industry, traditional and new media, we </p><p>are finally able to offer clients effective campaigns with exact </p><p>measurement. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Banner ads are just a small part of on-line marketing, as are opt-in </p><p>emails, rich media and WAP. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Like cinema ads, buses and post cards, these are tools, which have their </p><p>use, but to be most effective they must be integrated into the rest of a </p><p>campaign. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Integrating on-line marketing allows us to move beyond measuring just </p><p>recall and recognition, as the recent HKBU study did, and start </p><p>measuring the real drivers of our clients' businesses: preference, sales </p><p>and loyalty. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Only by taking this important step towards inter-agency cooperation and </p><p>integration will we be able to tap these incredible new </p><p>capabilities. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>As Jack says: "Why can't we all just get along?" </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>jay@bluesphere.net. </p><p><BR><BR> </p>

Over the past few weeks there has been lively debate on these pages

between some of Asia's leading Internet professionals.



There have been studies declaring that on-line advertising is

ineffective, letters arguing that print ads have no better recall than

on-line, and finally agencies asserting that their campaigns don't

suffer from declining click-through-rates (CTR).



All of the debate though should give us pause, and encourage us to ask:

is the industry really so fragmented in its opinions? Or is everyone

simply missing the point?



A recent US study may shed some light on the issue. Over the six-month

period of its Online Advertising Report, AdKnowledge tagged millions of

Internet users who were exposed to banners ads and then watched their

behaviour.



They found that the people who saw an ad, but never clicked, made more

conversions to on-line sales/actions than the people who had clicked on

the banners.



This result reinforces that the return on investment (ROI) for on-line

advertising is likely much higher than it seems simply from

click-through-rates. Mr Steve Findley, VP of AdKnoweldge, summed it up

by claiming that "advertisers that focus only on clicks or even

post-click conversions may miss vitally important effects of an

advertising campaign".



The element of accountability - being able to develop concrete metrics

such as cost-per-customer acquired - is the real benefit to come from

on-line marketing.



By working together as a unified industry, traditional and new media, we

are finally able to offer clients effective campaigns with exact

measurement.



Banner ads are just a small part of on-line marketing, as are opt-in

emails, rich media and WAP.



Like cinema ads, buses and post cards, these are tools, which have their

use, but to be most effective they must be integrated into the rest of a

campaign.



Integrating on-line marketing allows us to move beyond measuring just

recall and recognition, as the recent HKBU study did, and start

measuring the real drivers of our clients' businesses: preference, sales

and loyalty.



Only by taking this important step towards inter-agency cooperation and

integration will we be able to tap these incredible new

capabilities.



As Jack says: "Why can't we all just get along?"



jay@bluesphere.net.