Cannes judges rule O&M's Guinness effort legitimate

<p>SINGAPORE: Ogilvy & Mather Singapore's Cannes entry of a Guinness </p><p>Draught campaign has been ruled legitimate by the festival's </p><p>organisers. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>The ruling clears the way for O&M to keep the gold lion it won in the </p><p>press and poster category for the "What's on your mind", which had been </p><p>submitted under Asia Pacific Breweries name, although Gaelic Inns, which </p><p>has two Irish pubs in Singapore, paid for media costs and the agency </p><p>picked up the production tab. This coupled with the fact O&M had </p><p>approached Gaelic Inns with the creative work has led some Singapore ad </p><p>agencies to threaten to boycott the Creative Circle Awards (CCA) in </p><p>protest as O&M executive creative director, Andy Greenaway, is the CCA </p><p>chairman. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>But Cannes organisers argued that the campaign was not a scam because </p><p>Gaelic Inns paid for the media and that the error in O&M's submission </p><p>had no impact on the judging. The only outstanding issue with Cannes </p><p>organisers is whether the award should be in the print and poster retail </p><p>category rather than more prestigious alcoholic beverages. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>In an earlier interview with media, Greenaway pinned the situation on a </p><p>clerical error, which occurred because O&M had initially created the </p><p>campaign for APB's joint venture company United Stout Marketing. The </p><p>account was then moved to Saatchi & Saatchi in a global realignment </p><p>earlier this year. O&M said that when it submitted entries to Cannes, it </p><p>referred to the client on the original job number. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Tim Isaac, O&M regional vice-president, said the agency had approached </p><p>Gaelic Inns at the behest of Keith Harris, general manager business </p><p>development at APB. Gaelic Inns is a franchisee of The Irish Pub </p><p>Company, an operating unit of Guinness. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Isaac said the allegations that the Guinness campaign was a scam ad had </p><p>caused "extreme damage" to his agency. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>He said rival ad agency bosses were playing up the issue in the press to </p><p>undermine O&M's credibility. </p><p><BR><BR> </p>

SINGAPORE: Ogilvy & Mather Singapore's Cannes entry of a Guinness

Draught campaign has been ruled legitimate by the festival's

organisers.



The ruling clears the way for O&M to keep the gold lion it won in the

press and poster category for the "What's on your mind", which had been

submitted under Asia Pacific Breweries name, although Gaelic Inns, which

has two Irish pubs in Singapore, paid for media costs and the agency

picked up the production tab. This coupled with the fact O&M had

approached Gaelic Inns with the creative work has led some Singapore ad

agencies to threaten to boycott the Creative Circle Awards (CCA) in

protest as O&M executive creative director, Andy Greenaway, is the CCA

chairman.



But Cannes organisers argued that the campaign was not a scam because

Gaelic Inns paid for the media and that the error in O&M's submission

had no impact on the judging. The only outstanding issue with Cannes

organisers is whether the award should be in the print and poster retail

category rather than more prestigious alcoholic beverages.



In an earlier interview with media, Greenaway pinned the situation on a

clerical error, which occurred because O&M had initially created the

campaign for APB's joint venture company United Stout Marketing. The

account was then moved to Saatchi & Saatchi in a global realignment

earlier this year. O&M said that when it submitted entries to Cannes, it

referred to the client on the original job number.



Tim Isaac, O&M regional vice-president, said the agency had approached

Gaelic Inns at the behest of Keith Harris, general manager business

development at APB. Gaelic Inns is a franchisee of The Irish Pub

Company, an operating unit of Guinness.



Isaac said the allegations that the Guinness campaign was a scam ad had

caused "extreme damage" to his agency.



He said rival ad agency bosses were playing up the issue in the press to

undermine O&M's credibility.