Anthrax scare derails Economist campaign

<p>HONG KONG: The Economist has pulled a direct mail campaign in Asia </p><p>after the promotional material became enveloped in the anthrax scare </p><p>gripping the world. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>A statement by the magazine said the DM piece was withdrawn after it </p><p>caused "alarm to some recipients, fearing it was connected to terrorist </p><p>activity". </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>It stressed that the "assumption is wildly untrue", but added: "Given </p><p>the current world situation, we will discontinue this marketing campaign </p><p>to avoid further alarm among our potential subscribers." </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>At the centre of the controversy was the specific design of the outer </p><p>packaging, which featured the names of some of the world's most </p><p>prominent political and business leaders - Richard Branson, Lee Kwan </p><p>Yew, George W. Bush, Nelson Mandela and Bill Gates - crossed out in red </p><p>ink. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>The Economist Asia-Pacific advertising director, Rupert Harrow, </p><p>described the incident as unfortunate. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>"Some people saw these recognisable names on the packaging and, </p><p>unfortunately in the current climate, many put two and two together and </p><p>got six," he said. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>Peter Bakker, regional marketing director of The Economist, said the </p><p>campaign was rolled out on September 20, just over a week after the </p><p>terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, but weeks before the </p><p>anthrax scare erupted. "We had no way of recognising the potential </p><p>negative response to these mail ads," he said. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>The scare has been exacerbated by events linked to The Economist in </p><p>Europe, when issues of the magazine were withdrawn from the market after </p><p>white powder was discovered in the mailing envelopes. "This was traced </p><p>to the print production firm in Holland which had used the powder as a </p><p>drying agent, designed to combat print dampness and, following </p><p>laboratory testing, revealed as non-toxic," said Bakker. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>The Economist has started developing a new marketing package, likely to </p><p>be published and distributed by early 2002. The design is expected to </p><p>follow a number of new guidelines that have been established, primarily </p><p>by the US Direct Marketing Association, to promote the security and </p><p>integrity of the business. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>These include avoiding plain envelopes, using a clear and identifiable </p><p>return address, including a phone number and/or website URL on envelopes </p><p>and using an email/telecommunication campaign in conjunction with a </p><p>letter drop. </p><p><BR><BR> </p><p>It is understood the anthrax scare has led other direct marketers to </p><p>reconsider distribution channels, focusing more on email campaigns </p><p>instead of the regular mail service. The shift, said McCann Relationship </p><p>Marketing managing director Henrik Monefeldt, has also been driven by </p><p>advertisers looking to reduce costs. </p><p><BR><BR> </p>

HONG KONG: The Economist has pulled a direct mail campaign in Asia

after the promotional material became enveloped in the anthrax scare

gripping the world.



A statement by the magazine said the DM piece was withdrawn after it

caused "alarm to some recipients, fearing it was connected to terrorist

activity".



It stressed that the "assumption is wildly untrue", but added: "Given

the current world situation, we will discontinue this marketing campaign

to avoid further alarm among our potential subscribers."



At the centre of the controversy was the specific design of the outer

packaging, which featured the names of some of the world's most

prominent political and business leaders - Richard Branson, Lee Kwan

Yew, George W. Bush, Nelson Mandela and Bill Gates - crossed out in red

ink.



The Economist Asia-Pacific advertising director, Rupert Harrow,

described the incident as unfortunate.



"Some people saw these recognisable names on the packaging and,

unfortunately in the current climate, many put two and two together and

got six," he said.



Peter Bakker, regional marketing director of The Economist, said the

campaign was rolled out on September 20, just over a week after the

terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, but weeks before the

anthrax scare erupted. "We had no way of recognising the potential

negative response to these mail ads," he said.



The scare has been exacerbated by events linked to The Economist in

Europe, when issues of the magazine were withdrawn from the market after

white powder was discovered in the mailing envelopes. "This was traced

to the print production firm in Holland which had used the powder as a

drying agent, designed to combat print dampness and, following

laboratory testing, revealed as non-toxic," said Bakker.



The Economist has started developing a new marketing package, likely to

be published and distributed by early 2002. The design is expected to

follow a number of new guidelines that have been established, primarily

by the US Direct Marketing Association, to promote the security and

integrity of the business.



These include avoiding plain envelopes, using a clear and identifiable

return address, including a phone number and/or website URL on envelopes

and using an email/telecommunication campaign in conjunction with a

letter drop.



It is understood the anthrax scare has led other direct marketers to

reconsider distribution channels, focusing more on email campaigns

instead of the regular mail service. The shift, said McCann Relationship

Marketing managing director Henrik Monefeldt, has also been driven by

advertisers looking to reduce costs.